Is it considered a waste to be selected for the second team at the age of 39? James broke the record but was ridiculed by the public! Should this honor be given to young people?

39-year-old James still be selected for the best team? Is this strength or emotion? When the NBA announced the list of the second team in the All-A-Level Team, the entire basketball circle exploded. The data single of 24.4 points + 7.8 rebounds + 8.2 assists seems to be impressive, but if you look closely at the shooting percentage: 37.6% of three-pointers ranked 89th in the league, and the defensive efficiency value fell to a career low. What's even more eye-catching is that the Lakers lost 1-4 in the first round. Can they still be selected for the second team with such a team-leading result?

supporters have moved out of historical records - they have been selected to crush all seniors for 21 consecutive years, and 13 times have passed and are unprecedented. But opponents showed cold data: Doncic, who also averaged 24+8 per game, sat firmly for a while, and the 27-year-old Davis failed to get even three matches. What's even more dazzling is that James repeatedly invisible in the fourth quarter in the key battle, facing the Timberwolves' life and death battle, he made only 4 of 13 shots.

NBA legend Barkley fired on the show: "The league is creating an ageless myth. 20 years ago this kind of data could only enter the third team! "But senior reporter Vincenster retorted: "Look at his attendance rate of 70 games with injuries, which 39-year-old player can do it?" Behind this debate, there is the ultimate collision between the NBA star-making mechanism and the laws of competitive sports.

When James said in person that "continue to win the championship next season" he said even more doubts - is he holding a total salary of 430 million US dollars continuing the legend or blocking the upward channel of the new generation? Can he continue to set new records next season? Perhaps even time has become his opponent.